The Legal Ombudsman

The Legal Ombudsman
Credit: Image generated by AI/ Gemini

The Legal Ombudsman: is it an effective complaints body? In nearly every prison, the same story can be heard over and over. Prisoners have been badly let down by their legal team on legal aid. In numerous cases, the accused had been persuaded by the barristers who came on the scene either the day before the hearing or a short time before the hearing, with a complete lack of understanding of the accused’s situation. The easy way out is to persuade the accused to plead guilty even though the person was innocent, in the expectation that the accused would get a reduced or suspended sentence. This very rarely happens and it is usually too late, and the accused becomes a prisoner.

In anger and bewilderment, the prisoner takes it out on the officers or gets involved in the consumption of illegal substances which are always available, and very much to the detriment of prisoners. 

In order to make a complaint about the legal representation, one must first make the complaint to the barrister or the solicitor, where they have eight weeks to respond. This process takes time, cutting into the time required by the Ombudsman to consider a complaint within a one-year deadline. Ultimately, after having received the final response as required for the complaint to proceed with reasons as to why the prisoner is not satisfied, the Ombudsman usually acknowledges the letter but states that it will not be considered until after about eight weeks due to the high volume of correspondence.

The process then involves allocation to a caseworker, which can take several months. The Ombudsman usually keeps in contact by saying that complaints made several months before, or even more than a year before, are being considered and he would like to know whether the prisoner still wishes to pursue the complaint. In my situation, more than two years has gone by, and the Ombudsman is still trying to allocate my complaint to a caseworker and wanting to know whether I still want to pursue the complaint.

I have changed prisons a few times and I promptly informed the Ombudsman of my change of address on three occasions. The address has not been amended so far and neither has any progress been made with the complaint. What is the point of these people?

 

Name withheld HMYOI Feltham

Name withheld HMYOI Feltham

One thought on “The Legal Ombudsman

  1. The foreshortened consultation time, is confirmed by outside Barristers’ tell-all books as being real enough. So, how best to deploy the evidence of your innocence, and sink any unfair accusations, – could have occupied your mind beforehand? Was any police interview done fairly under PACE? Did you choose to use the legal adviser, your right on being arrested? Is your own confession deficient in some way? Do you know what a helpful McKenzie Friend is? I’m humbly suggesting collecting everything in your mind, before a Barrister shows up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Conditions of acceptance of website comments

Inside Time does not wish to apply censorship to comments posted on its website, however, we may remove posts if they have been flagged as inappropriate.

You must not publish material that includes anything that:
- is considered to be offensive or includes inappropriate language
- may incite others to break the law
- identifies others by name, unless referring to the author of a previously published item
- includes unsubstantiated claims or hearsay but presented as fact
- includes personal opinions that are presented as fact
- includes discriminatory or derogatory comments about any person or section of society
- includes the alleged offences of named individuals unless it is considered to be already common public knowledge

All comments should address the original article or mailbag item and comments criticising other posters will not be posted unless they add something material to the original item.
Multiple postings under different names from the same IP address will not be posted and will be blocked from further posting.
Comments will be deleted if they contain foul language.
Inside Time reserve the right to republish comments in its newspaper or in any of its other publications, however, in these cases, comments will be anonymised.
The views and opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position Inside Time.
×