They tell me to ‘stop playing the trans card’

They tell me to ‘stop playing the trans card’

I would like to respond to Serco’s comment in relation to the letter ‘Bullying Allowed’ (Mailbag, June). As a transgender woman who also lives at Ashfield, I have to say, I don’t recognise the prison that Serco describes. They state that bullying is not tolerated and inappropriate behaviour is challenged immediately, but this is simply not true.

Transphobic and homophobic attitudes are rampant, and often it is staff and not prisoners who engage in this. Moreover, it’s seldom, if ever challenged. Discrimination complaints often aren’t even upheld, let alone dealt with. The prisons approach is to deny discrimination even exists, even when it manifests as physical violence.

I am the vice-chair of the Pride Forum, and I am uncomfortable with Serco using the forum’s existence to claim they promote the protected characteristics. Through the forum, we have routinely requested that staff undergo much needed training around LGBTQIA+ issues but have been consistently knocked back, with senior management choosing instead to deliver, as a cost-saving measure, inadequate training in-house. And then ask us, as victims, what we’re doing about it.

Ashfield’s management team will often proudly proclaim that they have the highest number of trans prisoners in any Serco run prison, and yet they refused to make reasonable adjustments for us. I myself am often misgendered, or targeted unjustly by staff because of my gender, and yet when I’ve challenged this, at best I’m told to stop playing the trans card, at worst I’m given negative IEPs (Incentives and Earned Privileges scheme warnings) for calling staff bigots. I have witnessed prisoners violently target other trans people, in full view of officers, and the prison simply denied the incident ever happened.

Serco would do well to deal with the environment of toxicities before they are allowed to spread.

Editorial note – In the Mailbag ‘Bullying Allowed’, another transgender prisoner at Ashfield claimed that they are bullied and that staff “brush it under the carpet”. Serco says that every transgender prisoner at Ashfield receives an initial review within 14 days of arrival, with formal reviews at least every six months. The prison has a dedicated Diversity and Inclusion Manager, and quarterly meetings of the Diversity and Equality Action Team where prisoners participate. Responding to Lexi S’s letter, a Serco spokesperson said: “We don’t recognise these claims. HMP Ashfield is proud of its inclusive environment and has a significant transgender prisoner population, all of whom are welcomed and supported. We hold monthly forums for each protected characteristic, and we are not aware of any complaints relating to discrimination.”

Lexi S HMP Ashfield

Lexi S HMP Ashfield

3 thoughts on “They tell me to ‘stop playing the trans card’

  1. I’m humbly not sure that calling Officers “bigots” is the way forward. Maybe adding value to others’ lives, might help? They might have different, but more serious problems than yours. Your sympathetic ear might even be acceptable. Because you know what it’s like?

  2. As I am sure the writer knows, UK prisons demand that people being victimised by staff must use the complaints process that asks the same staff to evaluate complaints, under a hierarchy that values staff voices far above those of prisoners. This is endemic in the UK prison system and is unlikely to change without a revolutionary transformation of the entire criminal justice system. Trans people are particularly vulnerable in 2026.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Conditions of acceptance of website comments

Inside Time does not wish to apply censorship to comments posted on its website, however, we may remove posts if they have been flagged as inappropriate.

You must not publish material that includes anything that:
- is considered to be offensive or includes inappropriate language
- may incite others to break the law
- identifies others by name, unless referring to the author of a previously published item
- includes unsubstantiated claims or hearsay but presented as fact
- includes personal opinions that are presented as fact
- includes discriminatory or derogatory comments about any person or section of society
- includes the alleged offences of named individuals unless it is considered to be already common public knowledge

All comments should address the original article or mailbag item and comments criticising other posters will not be posted unless they add something material to the original item.
Multiple postings under different names from the same IP address will not be posted and will be blocked from further posting.
Comments will be deleted if they contain foul language.
Inside Time reserve the right to republish comments in its newspaper or in any of its other publications, however, in these cases, comments will be anonymised.
The views and opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position Inside Time.
×