Cells which aren’t locked at night prove popular with prisoners and staff

Cells which aren’t locked at night prove popular with prisoners and staff
Photo credit: Ministry of Justice

Temporary cells known as ‘pods’ where prisoners are not locked in overnight are proving popular with residents and staff, research by the Prison Service has found.

Known officially as Rapid Deployment Cells, the first were unveiled at HMP Norwich in March 2023 (pictured) and since then around 800 have been installed in the grounds of 15 prisons in England and Wales. A further 1,000 are planned, as a measure to boost capacity in the prison estate.

Built with a steel frame, they can be stacked on top of one another and provide single-occupancy accommodation with bar-free windows, en suite bathrooms, and in-cell heating and air conditioning which the occupant can control.

Because the pods can only be occupied by category D and selected low-risk category C prisoners, they tend to see fewer problems with violence and drugs than regular wings. 

In study by the Ministry of Justice Analysis Directorate, published last month, researchers interviewed 69 prisoners living in the pods, as well as 16 officers and 11 governor grades, to ask their views on the accommodation.

The researchers found that those living in them often had later curfews and more out-of-cell time than their counterparts on regular wings. The study noted: “Many walked unescorted to work, managed their own routines, and handled tasks like cooking and laundry.” 

Because the pods were so popular, some prisons used them as an incentive for good behaviour. One resident told the researchers: “Prisoners have more hope. People want to come here now. People want to work hard to get here, people who didn’t care before.”

The researchers said: “While the RDC programme was not initially designed as an incentive programme, it effectively functioned as one by encouraging and rewarding good behaviour … The RDC programme instilled a sense of hope and aspiration among the broader prison population, with prisoners striving to meet the criteria to move to the RDCs.”

They noted: “A strong sense of community developed, supported by communal events (e.g. shared meals) and peer cooperation. Absence of bullying, violence, and theft was consistently reported, with many prisoners feeling comfortable leaving doors open and sharing communal spaces. This contributed to feelings of safety among prisoners.

“Prisoners noted increased trust from staff, with less visible surveillance and more autonomy over personal spaces, encouraging responsibility.”

A governor told the researchers: “The [RDC] units give real control at a proper level, which gives a prisoner a feeling of autonomy, a feeling of self-esteem, a feeling of worth, a feeling of ‘I have some control’ – that’s really important.”

The researchers concluded: “Many prisoners reportedly viewed placement in the RDCs as an aspirational goal, and felt behaviour and attitudes were much better in RDCs compared to the main wings. The RDCs also supported prison management by enabling more efficient use of resources and offering safer environments for people convicted of sexual offences and other vulnerable prisoner cohorts. Their use has, in some cases, been perceived to reduce violence, self-harm, and drug misuse.

“Prisoners appreciated the modern, spacious, and well-equipped cells, communal spaces, and outdoor areas, which were seen as significant improvements compared to the main wings. However, some participants identified areas for improvement, including in-cell safety alarms, storage, and outdoor cover. Officers reported the RDCs offered more room availability, and improved CCTV coverage, contributing to safer and more efficient operations.”

 

 

Inside Time Reports

Inside Time Reports

One thought on “Cells which aren’t locked at night prove popular with prisoners and staff

  1. There’s still the difficult-to-dispel idea that if all the decent inmate brains were occupied, – as they are here, – then fewer bored brains would be seeking the deep numb of illicit drugs.

    But the funding of ‘occupations’, and the funding of ‘illicit drugs,’ – these fundings come from wholly different sources, I humbly suppose!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Conditions of acceptance of website comments

Inside Time does not wish to apply censorship to comments posted on its website, however, we may remove posts if they have been flagged as inappropriate.

You must not publish material that includes anything that:
- is considered to be offensive or includes inappropriate language
- may incite others to break the law
- identifies others by name, unless referring to the author of a previously published item
- includes unsubstantiated claims or hearsay but presented as fact
- includes personal opinions that are presented as fact
- includes discriminatory or derogatory comments about any person or section of society
- includes the alleged offences of named individuals unless it is considered to be already common public knowledge

All comments should address the original article or mailbag item and comments criticising other posters will not be posted unless they add something material to the original item.
Multiple postings under different names from the same IP address will not be posted and will be blocked from further posting.
Comments will be deleted if they contain foul language.
Inside Time reserve the right to republish comments in its newspaper or in any of its other publications, however, in these cases, comments will be anonymised.
The views and opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position Inside Time.
×