‘Judges should have power to block recall decisions’
Judges should review attempts by the Probation Service to recall ex-prisoners to custody and block the move when it is unjustified, a report has said.
The call came from the Prison Reform Trust in a report (pictured) on the issues facing people released after serving long jail terms.
Research Dr Ailie Rennie carried out in-depth interview with people now living in the community after serving long prison terms – more than 10 years for men or eight years for women, or a life sentence.
Among her recommendations was that “HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) should revise the recall process to include an independent judicial review at the point of recall, to ensure that such action is necessary, proportionate, and based on clear evidence of risk.”
Explaining the need for the policy change, the report added: “Overreliance on recall for technical breaches or minor infractions can disrupt other positive progress in the community, undermine efforts at reintegration, and reduce the legitimacy of probation.
“A structured review process should be implemented to ensure recall decisions are fair, necessary, and consider the individual’s progress, circumstances, and risk level. This should occur prior to the individual being returned to prison to avoid any unnecessary further imprisonment.”
The report found that people released from long sentences face barriers on reintegrating into the community including difficulties in finding housing and employment, and rebuilding relationships. Many said they found that restrictive licence conditions, imposed by the Probation Service, made it harder for them to exercise independence and rebuild their lives.
Other recommendations in the report include the introduction of dedicated resettlement teams within prisons; better pre-release training including in the use of technology and job-seeking; improved through-the-gate support including ‘departure packs’ containing toiletries, sanitary items, a change of care clothes, ID, and a SIM card; and training probation officers on the specific needs of long-sentenced prisoners.
In 2024, people serving indeterminate sentences such as life or imprisonment for public protection (IPP) were released on 1,450 occasions from prisons in England and Wales. Of these, 443 were first releases and 1,007 were rereleases following a recall to custody. For people serving long fixed-term sentences there were 2,021 releases in 2024.
The number of recalled prisoners in England and Wales has doubled in the past decade, to 13,000, and they now account for one in seven, or nearly 15 per cent, of the jail population. For every four people released from prison in the first three months of 2025, three were recalled for breaching licence conditions. The growing number of people on recall has been identified as one of the main causes of the prison capacity crisis.
Pia Sinha, chief executive of the PRT, said: “This report highlights the urgent need for targeted support and policy reform to help people serving long prison sentences to reintegrate successfully in the community. It comes at a critical moment, as policymakers seek new solutions to arrest the prison capacity crisis.”

Conditions of acceptance of website comments
Inside Time does not wish to apply censorship to comments posted on its website, however, we may remove posts if they have been flagged as inappropriate.You must not publish material that includes anything that:
- is considered to be offensive or includes inappropriate language
- may incite others to break the law
- identifies others by name, unless referring to the author of a previously published item
- includes unsubstantiated claims or hearsay but presented as fact
- includes personal opinions that are presented as fact
- includes discriminatory or derogatory comments about any person or section of society
- includes the alleged offences of named individuals unless it is considered to be already common public knowledge
All comments should address the original article or mailbag item and comments criticising other posters will not be posted unless they add something material to the original item.
Multiple postings under different names from the same IP address will not be posted and will be blocked from further posting.
Comments will be deleted if they contain foul language.
Inside Time reserve the right to republish comments in its newspaper or in any of its other publications, however, in these cases, comments will be anonymised.
The views and opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position Inside Time.