Lay Observers criticise court cells

Lay Observers criticise court cells
Credit: Andy Aitchison

Concerns about the treatment of people in court awaiting trial have been raised in a watchdog’s annual report.

The Lay Observers – unpaid public appointees who monitor court cells and the transport of people in custody – criticised the treatment of children, young people, and elderly people in courts. The report says the facilities are barely coping with the amount of people they need to hold, due to staff shortages.

The Lay Observers said that whilst they had reported on poor conditions in previous years, they had identified two new areas of concern: lack of acceptable seating, particularly as there are more elderly prisoners appearing in court now, and the poor standard of food for those held for many hours.

Highlighted issues unresolved from year to year include poor and unreliable transport, lack of staff, and poor treatment of children and young people. The watchdog is particularly concerned at the effect on children and young people who are kept locked in small cells in the courts for hours at a time whilst waiting for cases that are often delayed due to time pressure. One young person spent 15 hours, including transport to and from court, and awaiting the hearing. Almost half of the hearings lacked staff trained to deal with the need of young people.

The watchdog praised staff for managing to keep the service going despite stress and personal danger, with some working in excess of 60 hours per week which it said is unsustainable.

It asked for areas where young people can be held outside of cells, and said they should be transported to court without the intimidating presence of adults being moved. It wants decent seating available for elderly people, and reading materials for those waiting, including in different languages appropriate for the area. Above all it wants sufficient trained staff to be available at all times.

Inside Time Reports

Inside Time Reports

2 thoughts on “Lay Observers criticise court cells

  1. In wider terms, there seem to be few systems under strain in our country, that lack free supervisory advice. I think there’s a deliberate mistake there somewhere.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Conditions of acceptance of website comments

Inside Time does not wish to apply censorship to comments posted on its website, however, we may remove posts if they have been flagged as inappropriate.

You must not publish material that includes anything that:
- is considered to be offensive or includes inappropriate language
- may incite others to break the law
- identifies others by name, unless referring to the author of a previously published item
- includes unsubstantiated claims or hearsay but presented as fact
- includes personal opinions that are presented as fact
- includes discriminatory or derogatory comments about any person or section of society
- includes the alleged offences of named individuals unless it is considered to be already common public knowledge

All comments should address the original article or mailbag item and comments criticising other posters will not be posted unless they add something material to the original item.
Multiple postings under different names from the same IP address will not be posted and will be blocked from further posting.
Comments will be deleted if they contain foul language.
Inside Time reserve the right to republish comments in its newspaper or in any of its other publications, however, in these cases, comments will be anonymised.
The views and opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position Inside Time.
×