Parliamentarians to investigate forensic science

Parliamentarians to investigate forensic science
analysis biochemistry biologist 2030265

MPs and peers have launched an inquiry into the state of forensic science – amid concerns that mistakes are leading to innocent people being wrongly convicted.

The Westminster Commission on Forensic Science will question experts, lawyers, police investigators and victims of miscarriages of justice. It will set out its findings in a report, expected in 2024.

The inquiry will be co-chaired by Baroness Black of Strome, a forensic anthropologist and cross-bench peer, and Professor Angela Gallop, a leading forensic scientist. It has been established by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Miscarriages of Justice (APPGMJ), a group of parliamentarians with an interest in the area.

At the same time, the APPGMJ is establishing five sub-committees to focus its work on key areas of concern. As well as the sub-committee on science and the courts, which will oversee the Westminster Commission on Forensic Science, separate sub-committees will look at the criminal appeals system, legal policy, the legal profession, and the role of the media.

The Coalition government scrapped the state-owned Forensic Science Service in 2012 and police forces now do their own analysis or contract it out to private labs. A report by the Lords Science and Technology Committee in 2019 found that that forensic science was underfunded, with too little research being carried out, and that Legal Aid cuts meant defendants could not always hire their own experts to challenge prosecution forensic evidence.

Barry Sheerman, the Labour MP who co-chairs the APPGMJ, said: “Our reputation as the global gold standard for forensic sciences has been badly tarnished over the last decade. Today we launch an investigation into the state of the sector and we do that as a result of our concern that the innocent are being wrongly convicted. The Westminster Commission on Forensic Science will shine a light on the sector and how its ‘products’ are used, and make recommendations to drive up quality and reliability in this important but overlooked corner of the justice system.”

Sir Bob Neill, the Conservative MP who co-chairs the APPGMJ and also chairs the Commons Justice Committee, said that forensic science had been at the heart of notorious miscarriages of justice including the cases of the Birmingham Six and the Guildford Four. He said: “The misapplication of forensic science can and often has resulted in the wrongful conviction for many years of the innocent. But pioneering forensic approaches can lead to wrongful convictions being overturned and justice restored.”

Members of the Westminster Commission on Forensic Science include Professor Carole McCartney of Leicester Law School; former detective chief superintendent Steve Wilkins; Katy Thorne KC; DNA expert Dr Philip Avenell; and Neil Denison, director of Yorkshire and Humberside Regional Scientific Support Services.

Inside Time Reports

Inside Time Reports

One thought on “Parliamentarians to investigate forensic science

  1. Here inside times ask them people if they would like to know about my case
    Because there was no everdeince in my case they used a law called moorov doctrine
    A serious misscarrage of justice iam trying to get new everdence to prove I was stitched up by the Scottish authorities
    Parliamentarians take a look at my case
    Because the authorities don’t want people to know the truth

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Conditions of acceptance of website comments

Inside Time does not wish to apply censorship to comments posted on its website, however, we may remove posts if they have been flagged as inappropriate.

You must not publish material that includes anything that:
- is considered to be offensive or includes inappropriate language
- may incite others to break the law
- identifies others by name, unless referring to the author of a previously published item
- includes unsubstantiated claims or hearsay but presented as fact
- includes personal opinions that are presented as fact
- includes discriminatory or derogatory comments about any person or section of society
- includes the alleged offences of named individuals unless it is considered to be already common public knowledge

All comments should address the original article or mailbag item and comments criticising other posters will not be posted unless they add something material to the original item.
Multiple postings under different names from the same IP address will not be posted and will be blocked from further posting.
Comments will be deleted if they contain foul language.
Inside Time reserve the right to republish comments in its newspaper or in any of its other publications, however, in these cases, comments will be anonymised.
The views and opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position Inside Time.
×