Probation now lasts just 16 weeks

Thousands of prison-leavers and people on community sentences are getting only 16 weeks of supervision under a policy designed to ease the workload of the overstretched Probation Service.

The ‘Impact’ policy was introduced on 28 April, without announcement. People starting on probation after that date who are assessed as low or medium risk of causing serious harm will attend between four and seven meetings with their probation officer before contact is suspended at the 16-week point.

It means that someone sentenced to 10 years in prison, who is released on licence after four years and might have expected to spend the next six years under supervision, may now spend only four months under supervision – although they would remain on licence until the end of their sentence.

The new approach appears at odds with the sentencing reforms proposed by David Gauke’s Independent Sentencing Review and adopted by the Government in May, which would see most people handed prison sentences spending the first third in custody and the next third under intensive probation supervision. Mr Gauke also called for people serving community sentences to be supervised intensively, to reassure judges and magistrates.

Rules for Impact have not been made public, but Inside Time used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain a document titled ‘Impact: a lower intensity approach – staff guidance’. 

It says the aim of Impact is to “assist us to refocus probation’s finite resources”.

It lists groups who are automatically excluded from the 16-week cut-off, including people convicted of sexual offences, domestic abuse, and serious violent crimes, as well as under-18s. Probation managers have an option to exclude people linked to organised crime, street gangs, county lines or hate crime.

A hint of the new policy was offered by Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood in a speech in February, in which she warned that the Probation Service would have to reduce the amount of work it did with lower-risk offenders – but did not mention the 16-week cut-off.

In the speech, delivered at London probation headquarters in Southwark, Ms Mahmood said that when Labour came to power last year it inherited a Probation Service “burdened with a workload that was quite simply impossible”, with a caseload of almost 250,000 people.

She said: “For lower-risk offenders, we will task probation officers with providing a swifter intervention … as long as the offender stays on the straight and narrow, we must then focus probation officers’ time more effectively.” 

The staff guidance says that people managed under the Impact guidelines will get a minimum of four meetings with their probation officer: an induction appointment, a meeting to complete assessments, and two ‘desistance conversations’ – once called “Starting with the end in mind”, the other called “My future story”.

They may get up to three further meetings if they require a home visit, a three-way meeting involving another agency, or further desistance conversations.

Solicitor Laura Janes, vice-chair of the Association of Prison Lawyers, told Inside Time: “It is unclear how the policy will work with the proposed Gauke reforms, which rely on the very opposite approach of more intensive and robust supervision and support in the community.”

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “Our top priority is keeping the public safe. Those who pose a high or very high risk will always be subject to robust license conditions throughout their sentence. We are boosting probation funding by 45 per cent, investing up to £700 million more by 2028, and are on track to recruit 2,300 probation officers nationally by March next year.”

Impact – staff guidance

Inside Time Reports

Inside Time Reports

One thought on “Probation now lasts just 16 weeks

  1. It’s clear not everyone in probation agrees with the “do less” direction being talked about. This article is one of several I’ve seen lately showing probation could be so much more — with greater focus on help, rehabilitation, and genuine support rather than restriction, punishment, and constant recall. Shame there aren’t more approaches like this. Gauke seems to agree though.

    https://www.probation-institute.org/news/shaping-probations-identity

    This might all be an anomoly but the writer did previously made it into Inside Time, calling for former prisoners to have the chance to train as probation officers — “Prisoners today… professionals tomorrow.” That’s the kind of forward-thinking approach probation needs more of.

    https://insidetime.org/comment/prisoners-today-professionals-tomorrow/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Conditions of acceptance of website comments

Inside Time does not wish to apply censorship to comments posted on its website, however, we may remove posts if they have been flagged as inappropriate.

You must not publish material that includes anything that:
- is considered to be offensive or includes inappropriate language
- may incite others to break the law
- identifies others by name, unless referring to the author of a previously published item
- includes unsubstantiated claims or hearsay but presented as fact
- includes personal opinions that are presented as fact
- includes discriminatory or derogatory comments about any person or section of society
- includes the alleged offences of named individuals unless it is considered to be already common public knowledge

All comments should address the original article or mailbag item and comments criticising other posters will not be posted unless they add something material to the original item.
Multiple postings under different names from the same IP address will not be posted and will be blocked from further posting.
Comments will be deleted if they contain foul language.
Inside Time reserve the right to republish comments in its newspaper or in any of its other publications, however, in these cases, comments will be anonymised.
The views and opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position Inside Time.
×