Youth Justice Board opposes placing 18 year-olds in young offenders’ institutions

Youth Justice Board opposes placing 18 year-olds in young offenders’ institutions
Credit: Andy Aitchison

One of the lesser reported statements by the Justice Secretary Alex Norris during his address to Parliament related to young offenders’ institutes. He said that the Government have “made the decision to hold 18-year-olds for longer (on a careful case-by-case basis) in the youth estate.” He said this will be an “interim arrangement”, subject to regular reviews, “that we will look to end as soon as possible”. 

Phil Bowen, Interim Chair of the Youth Justice Board, has expressed concerns about this change of policy, which had not been previously suggested. He stated: “We recognise the significant challenges currently facing the adult prison estate and the difficult decisions that ministers must make in managing prison capacity. However, the safety and welfare of children in custody remain [the Board’s] overriding consideration.

“We are therefore disappointed by the announcement to reverse the policy that prevented 18-year-olds from being held in the secure estate for children. Our oversight work, supported by wider evidence, demonstrates that children and young adults have distinct needs and require different approaches from staff and services. 

“The specialist skills required to support young adults effectively are not yet consistently in place across the children’s estate. Combined with ongoing challenges relating to staffing, the physical environment and the increasingly complex profile of children in custody, there is a real risk that this decision could have unintended consequences for the safety and well-being of both children and staff.”

He said that it is positive that over the last two decades, youth justice has achieved substantial reductions in the number of children entering the system and in the total number held in custody. Those improvements, he added, have not been driven by greater use of coercion or containment, but by a stronger focus on prevention, early intervention, partnership working and understanding the underlying causes of offending behaviour. 

He continued: “At the heart of this has been a commitment to evidence-informed practice and a clear theory of change that recognises offending is often linked to unmet needs, trauma, exclusion, poor mental health, unstable accommodation and a lack of positive relationships and opportunities. As the government considers the future of both youth and adult custody, there is a need for a coherent, evidence-based approach that is operationalised across the whole justice system. 

“This should focus on understanding what works to prevent offending and reoffending, building safer and more constructive environments, and ensuring that policy, commissioning, workforce development and operational delivery are all aligned to those aims,” he concluded, adding that in the Board’s view adding 18-year-olds into the YOI population could damage that progress.

In his parliamentary speech, Mr Norris also announced £4.5m of investment for “robust, community alternatives to locking children up”.

Inside Time Reports

Inside Time Reports

One thought on “Youth Justice Board opposes placing 18 year-olds in young offenders’ institutions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Conditions of acceptance of website comments

Inside Time does not wish to apply censorship to comments posted on its website, however, we may remove posts if they have been flagged as inappropriate.

You must not publish material that includes anything that:
- is considered to be offensive or includes inappropriate language
- may incite others to break the law
- identifies others by name, unless referring to the author of a previously published item
- includes unsubstantiated claims or hearsay but presented as fact
- includes personal opinions that are presented as fact
- includes discriminatory or derogatory comments about any person or section of society
- includes the alleged offences of named individuals unless it is considered to be already common public knowledge

All comments should address the original article or mailbag item and comments criticising other posters will not be posted unless they add something material to the original item.
Multiple postings under different names from the same IP address will not be posted and will be blocked from further posting.
Comments will be deleted if they contain foul language.
Inside Time reserve the right to republish comments in its newspaper or in any of its other publications, however, in these cases, comments will be anonymised.
The views and opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position Inside Time.
×